Ten people sent me Calendly links last week. Here's what I sent back.
I'm building a scheduling tool, which means LinkedIn now thinks I want to talk to every founder, marketer, consultant, and "scheduling solutions expert" on the platform. Connection requests roll in. Most of them end the same way.
"Happy to chat — here's my Calendly."
For most of the last decade, I'd have clicked the link, picked a time, and moved on. It's the path of least resistance, and most of the time it doesn't matter. But I'm building Proffer because I think it does matter, at least for some kinds of work — and if I really believe that, I should put it to the test. So a few weeks ago I started doing something different.
Now when someone sends me a Calendly link, I send back this:
"Happy to make the time. Send me your email and I'll send you three times that work for both of us."
That's it. No pitch, no link, no explanation of what Proffer is. Just an offer to do the scheduling work myself.
About half the time, they send their email. I open Proffer, glance at my calendar, pick three times in the next week or two that work for me, write a one-line note, and send. Sixty seconds of work. The recipient gets an email from my actual mailbox, sees three times laid out cleanly, clicks the one that works, and the meeting lands on both calendars before they finish their coffee.
The other half of the time, something more interesting happens. They reply with some version of: "Wait, what is this?"
And there it is — the demo, delivered without ever asking for one.
I want to be honest about what this experiment is, because I think it's worth naming. It's a piece of marketing. I'm building a product, I want people to know it exists, and replying to Calendly links with a Proffer is a deliberate way to put the product in front of the exact people who would benefit from it. It's not a pure act of hospitality on my part. There's intent behind it.
But here's what's interesting: even though the intent is marketing, the experience the recipient has isn't a marketing experience. They asked for a meeting. I gave them three times. The meeting got scheduled. That's the entire interaction. There's no signup wall, no demo request, no sales follow-up sequence. The product did the work, and the product was the work. The marketing and the value are the same thing.
A few things have surprised me about doing this for a couple of months.
The first is how often people remark on it. "This is so much nicer than the back-and-forth." "I like that this came from your real email." "Wait, you built this? Tell me more." The product is doing the work I'd otherwise be doing in a pitch, and it's doing it better than the pitch would, because the prospect is experiencing the thing directly instead of hearing a description of it.
The second is who ends up converting. It isn't always the people I'd have predicted. The folks who reply "What is this?" aren't always founders or marketers — they're often the senior consultants, the executive coaches, the small-firm partners. The people whose own scheduling workflow is built around hospitality, who recognize the form immediately because it's the form they'd use if they had the time to do it manually. The product demonstrates itself most clearly to the people who were already trying to solve this problem by hand.
The third is how this changes the rest of my outreach. I used to feel slightly weird about LinkedIn networking — the same vaguely transactional energy you get from any platform that gamifies professional relationships. The Proffer reply gave me a reason to engage that didn't feel transactional. I'm not selling them anything; I'm offering to make scheduling easier for both of us. The fact that it doubles as a product demo is incidental from their seat. The fact that it's the cleanest possible marketing channel I have is incidental from mine.
There's a broader principle here that I keep coming back to: the best marketing for a product is the product, doing its job, in front of the right person. No copy, no campaign, no clever framing comes close to the experience of using the thing and going "oh — yes."
For most products that's hard to arrange. You have to get someone to sign up, onboard, configure, and use the product before they experience the value. Whole marketing teams exist to bridge that gap.
For Proffer, the gap doesn't exist. The product is a thing the recipient experiences without doing anything. They click a time and it's done. The marketing for it is, literally, sending one. So that's what I'm doing — ten times last week, probably ten times this week, until I've personally Proffered every person on LinkedIn who'd benefit from it.
Try it on yourself if you're curious. Send a Proffer to your own inbox. Five a month on the free tier, no card required. See what your recipients would see — from your real mailbox, not a fictional sender.
And if you ever send me a Calendly link, you already know what I'll send back.
Send a Proffer to your own inbox.
Connect Outlook, pick a few times from your real calendar, and send one to your own inbox to see exactly what your recipients see. Five Proffers a month on the free tier. No card required.